Vivian Rebrin
TOK- Amy Hunt
Block 1
To What Extend Should
We Use Our Own Humanity to Study Human Behavior?
The human
sciences are a far more complex area of knowledge to study than for example the
natural sciences. In human sciences we are faces with several more implications
and assumptions rather than being precise and verified in the natural sciences.
The natural sciences can deal with specific experiments with controlled variables
that can be tested several times in order to check it’s validity. The human
sciences however is far more complicated because we do not have control of
human behavior and we can never be 100% sure if the data is authentic or not. The
human sciences do not involve constants that are true throughout the world.
This is why it is important to have some kind of human input when testing
anything related to the human sciences because us as humans are able to
identify things that we would do for example if we were being observed or asked
questions to. It is in our human nature to want to put the best first
impression of ourselves forward especially when it comes to being seen by total
strangers who are evaluating you. However, it is also important to not include
our personal bias as well when looking at other human behaviors because we are
also inclined to assume things especially when there isn’t concrete data to
look at.
In the
field of economics, human behavior is closely associated to the way a certain group
was brought up and to the area in which they’re working in. Scarcity is a
crucial factor in the field of economics and therefore how each person deals
with it especially in the different cultural areas that they are dealt with can
vary enormously. This field of human sciences is particularly harder to look at
because for instance objective knowledge, objectivity and unbiased, as well as
subjective, one’s impression and opinion, is valued equally in this field. Therefore,
it is harder to measure or predict one’s actions in this particular field.
Economics is an ever-changing area in which future actions might not
necessarily reflect past actions and vice versa. Another factor that creates
implications in studying this area is the language. This can be seen in the
concept of linguistic relativity in which it states that the structure of a
language will affect the way in which an individual perceives the world around
him as well as influencing their cognitive process.
This is why
a difference of language or culture can sometimes be beneficial in the area of
human sciences because confirmation bias is less likely to interfere with the
reflections based on the observations. One example of this idea can be seen in
the alien reports we did in class. Although we might not necessarily process
the reasoning behind why we do certain things, such as eating an egg or placing
a dog on a leash that to us seems perfectly natural, an outsider can think upon
these actions with a different point of view that we either are biased upon or
don’t want to think about at all. One example I thought was interesting was
that a person described eating an egg as eating an unborn child from a chicken.
A vegan might think that way but a person who is used to eating animals will
stick to their beliefs and argue that it is perfectly rational until the
disagreement between both parties becomes a polarized attitude. However, since
we still don’t have an alien’s point of view it’s essential to look outside the
framework of our beliefs and look at all possibilities when studying human
behaviors.
As can be
seen in the Ted Talk by Brene Brown, the definition of research is to control
and predict. However, she shows us that in the study of human behavior this is
sometimes impossible and that it is essential to use our own humanity in order
to understand human behaviors. She mentions how humans who are more vulnerable
tend to live happier lives and those who aren’t tend to numb their emotions
through dangerous cycles such as addiction, over eating, drinking, or taking
medication. These are actions that as humans we can understand and need to use
our humanity in order to help one another. She also mentions how the people who
weren’t happy with their lives weren’t vulnerable and pretended that their
actions did not affect those around them. This involves companies that are
trashing our ecosystem and not trying to resolve the problem or even not
considering animal rights such as in the egg example. In order to survive and
reproduce it is essential to use our humanity in order to help one another as
well as understand one another. For someone like Brene Brown who is a
sociologist it is harder to make a concrete decision based on observations due
to cultural relativism because it’s not specific enough. Although the example
she gives of vulnerability could be generalized to all she can never know for
sure since everyone is different especially in different cultures in which
people were brought up with different paradigms than others.
Overall,
using our own humanity in order to study human behaviors might be essential but
it also has its shortfalls. This can be seen in the examples of confirmation
bias that is understandable since we all have our different paradigms and it is
how we view our own world but it is also why we must keep an open mind and
especially in experiments relating to human behaviors must test with a variety
of different people and perceptions in order to gain full understanding.
Keeping an open mind and stepping out of our own frameworks is important in
order to understand new discoveries. This is why it is harder to categorize in
the area of human studies as opposed to for example the natural sciences. There
can never be a right or wrong in human studies because we have no control over
the experiments and prediction in human behavior is almost impossible since it
is never certain that an individual will always react in the same manner during
a set of circumstances. Therefore, it is
important to use our own humanity when observing human behavior but to also
keep an open mind when analyzing and reflecting upon our findings.
Word Count: 1,063
Good job, Vivian. There are several things you do well here. First, I think your overall approach to the question is effective, saying that there may be benefits to drawing on our humanity as well possible problems. That works as an overall structure for the paper. I'd like to see more explicit evidence, in the form of concepts/theories and examples, of the ways in which it's a benefit and ways in which it's an obstacle. I'm still not sure exactly when one should use it and when one shouldn't. Where exactly is the line? How are you drawing this line? Using more explicit vocabulary will help here as well. Terms like "validity" and "reliability" might make it into your text. And what about ceterus paribus? You should also work on connecting the paragraphs together so that they are parts of a whole exploration rather than just fragments. Each of your paragraphs will work; it's just that they need to be joined under the umbrella of your main idea (that in some cases we need to use our humanity). Finally, please go through your sentences and edit so that you have exactly the right words in your sentences. Struggling over the exact word you want can make your ideas much clearer as the process forces you to sort out ideas that may be a bit vague. Overall, I think you have enough ideas here. You have the basic template of your post. If you choose to rewrite, rather than adding another section, I'd rather you focus on cleaning up what you have, adding examples, using the vocabulary of the course, and bringing your paragraphs in line with an overall argument.
ReplyDeleteOne more thing. I would also be more explicit about adding the knowledge question or questions that you're working on. There is the main question, which I asked, but I'd like to see your version of that question show up in the introduction somewhere. I can see that in the rest of the post you are also working on several other knowledge questions, but you don't explicitly say what they are. Do that. :)
ReplyDelete