Thursday, August 28, 2014

To what extent should we use our own humanity to study human behavior?


Studying human behavior is essential to understanding how we live. However, we must learn how to effectively study human behavior. We must use our humanity to study human behavior, only discarding it when analyzing specific behavioral aspects. Even though the Alien Lens activity done in class proves that discarding our humanity helps us understand and criticize certain behaviors in our society, the Brene Brown Ted Talk proved that using our humanity helps us better analyze human behavior and further improve our lives.
The Alien Lens activity done in class strengthens the hypothesis that we have to ignore our humanity to study human behavior. We were assigned to write about 10 things we observed during the week through the eyes of an alien who has no idea what human behavior is like; has no humanity. The results we came up with were fascinating. For example, someone observed that humans carry around slaves with tags around their necks for identification. The slaves observed by the ‘alien’ are in fact dogs. People never think that having a pet dog could be seen like this. We see dogs as household pets that are part of the family, but we don’t realize that it’s plausible that owning a dog can be seen through the perspective of having a slave. If you think about it, it can create a feeling inside of you that want to ignore, which is going to be explored soon. Ignoring our humanity to study human behavior can be advantageous to study other groups that might be isolated from our so-called ‘civilized society’. By discarding what we know about human behavior, we see what an isolated group does with fresh eyes, not judging or criticizing what they do based on what we believe is right or wrong. For example, if we encounter a group that kills dogs for food, we might understand them as barbaric who kill innocent dogs. If we discard our humanity, we will see the group in a completely different way. We might see them as people who kill an animal for meat, just like almost every group we know, including ourselves. Using our humanity can mislead us in some cases, leaving us conclusions that might be completely equivocated.
However, using our humanity is vital while analyzing humans we already have a basic understanding of. In a Ted Talk, Brene Brown talks specifically about vulnerability. She highlights that embracing vulnerability leads a person to being ‘whole-hearted’. She researches vulnerability by interviewing people and interpreting their answers using her humanity. When she starts to think that vulnerability is key to life, she has a breakdown because it goes against everything she has lived for. She sees a therapist, which analyzes her breakdown using her humanity to give answers to Brown.  She says that by seeing someone else that uses his or her humanity to interpret what she’s thinking helped her enlighten and embrace vulnerability, which leads her to conclude her research. In her interviews, she interprets people’s answers using what she already knows about human behavior. This leads her to conclude that vulnerability leads to feelings of joy and compassion. When we try to drown our unwanted, vulnerable feelings in alcohol or bury them in food, we also stop thinking about good feelings, those of joy and compassion. By using her humanity in her interviews and the humanity of her therapist on herself, she gained a better understanding of human behavior. Using our humanity to study human behavior is essential for further analysis of how our society works. We can’t just ignore what we know about a society in order to study them. We have to be careful with confirmation bias, though. Sometimes, by using our humanity, we might seek for the answer that we want, and not that we need. Confirmation bias can play a role in a human behavior study when a researcher wants to prove something specific, then he or she seeks to find that proof using different experiments. This is dangerous because, even if the result is the one that we want, it may not be correct. If we choose to study human behavior using our humanity, we must be cautious that confirmation bias doesn’t get in the way of getting us the result that we need and desire.
Using our humanity to study human behavior is the best way to study societies that are already known by us, however, not using our humanity can be effective when studying cultures that we don’t know of. Brene Brown, through her Ted Talk, explores how she found the answer to living with joy and compassion through vulnerability, and she got to that conclusion by using her humanity. Nevertheless, the Alien Lens activity done in class proved that not using our humanity to study human behavior might open some doors that, even if we don’t want them open, they must be revealed.

Word Count: 813

1 comment:

  1. Nice job, Gui. You've written a clear response, shown two points of view, shown a sense of reader-awareness, elaborated two responses, used a ToK term, and reached a conclusion. I am so happy to see that you have the basic skeleton of a ToK response under control. The next step is to begin layering more complexity on top of this skeleton, which is strong enough to hang many more ideas and examples on. 1) You first need to find more examples. You have the alien lens explanation, on which you've done a really good job, and you apply it to people eating dogs, which works pretty well. But you need to get a final example in that vein of something real from an actual human science. That would get you full points for that paragraph. 2) Then you need to get the same kind of real example for the Brene Brown paragraph. Again, you've done a great job illustrating your understanding of her work, and this definitely helps answer the question, but for this to work you've get to test it against a real example. What about the Milgram experiment? What would Brene Brown say about that? Or maybe you came across another study when you were reseraching and reading in class. 3) Try to incorporate key ideas from chapter 18 (check your notes), especially validity, reliability, and generalizability. 4) Make a clear link to one of the ways of knowing 5) Introduce at least one more ToK idea (you have "confirmation bias." What else would apply here? Flip through your textbook. 5) Consider more than one meaning for the word "humanity." Follow the implications of the other definition as well.
    You're a good writer, Gui, and a clear thinker. If you did everything I've outlined, you could actually get an A.

    ReplyDelete